Current:Home > NewsThe White House is cracking down on overdraft fees -Legacy Profit Partners
The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
View
Date:2025-04-18 05:02:27
NEW YORK (AP) — The Biden administration has finalized a rule limiting overdraft fees banks can charge, as part of the White House’s campaign to reduce junk fees that hit consumers on everyday purchases, including banking services. President Joe Biden had called the fees, which can be as high as $35, “exploitative,” while the banking industry has lobbied extensively to keep the existing fee structures in place.
Under the finalized rule, banks will be able to choose from three options: they may charge a flat overdraft fee of $5, they may charge a fee that covers their costs and losses, or they may charge any fee so long as they disclose the terms of the overdraft loan the way they would for any other loan, typically expressed as an annual percentage rate, or APR.
While banks have cut back on overdraft fees in the past decade, the nation’s biggest banks still take in roughly $8 billion in the charges every year, according to data from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and bank public records. Currently, there is no cap on the overdraft fees that banks can legally charge.
Right now, when a bank temporarily lends a consumer money when their account has reached a zero balance, the consumer is typically responsible for paying back both the overdrawn amount and an additional fee, which can be more than the original amount charged. In one example often cited by opponents of the fees, a $3 cup of coffee can end up costing someone more than $30.
The finalized rule is set to take effect in October 2025, but the incoming Trump administration has yet to tap anyone to lead the CFPB, and has mentioned the idea of eliminating the agency.
The finalized rule applies to banks and credit unions that have more than $10 billion in assets, which includes the nation’s largest banks. Banks have previously sued the CFPB over these rules and caps on credit card late fees, and are likely to sue again. Congress also has the ability to challenge or overturn the rule.
Overdraft fees originated during a time when consumers wrote and cashed checks more frequently — so that the checks would clear instead of bouncing, if there was an issue of timing — but banks steadily increased the fees in the first two decades of the 2000s. The fees disproportionately affect banks’ most cash-strapped consumers. A majority of overdrafts (70%) are charged to customers with average account balances between $237 and $439, according to the CFPB.
The agency estimates the new rule would save consumers about $5 billion in annual overdraft fees, or $225 per household that typically experiences the fees.
_____
The Associated Press receives support from Charles Schwab Foundation for educational and explanatory reporting to improve financial literacy. The independent foundation is separate from Charles Schwab and Co. Inc. The AP is solely responsible for its journalism.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (8689)
Related
- McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
- Governor drafting plan to help Pennsylvania higher ed system that’s among the worst in affordability
- Review: Austin Butler's WWII epic 'Masters of the Air' is way too slow off the runway
- Family of elderly woman killed by alligator in Florida sues retirement community
- Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
- Southern Indiana man gets 55 years in woman’s decapitation slaying
- Evacuations underway in northeast Illinois after ice jam break on river causes significant flooding
- Funeral homes warned after FTC's first undercover phone sweep reveals misleading pricing
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- Pamper Yourself With a $59 Deal on $350 Worth of Products— Olaplex, 111SKIN, First Aid Beauty, and More
Ranking
- Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
- Owner’s Withdrawal From Offshore Wind Project Hobbles Maryland’s Clean Energy Plans
- Inmate overpowers deputy at hospital, flees to nearby home before fatally shooting himself
- Key takeaways from UN court’s ruling on Israel’s war in Gaza
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- Fatih Terim, the ‘Emperor’ of Turkish soccer, shakes up Greek league
- Person taken hostage in southern Germany, but rescued unharmed
- Mardi Gras 2024: New Orleans parade schedule, routes, what to know about the celebration
Recommendation
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
Alabama execution using nitrogen gas, the first ever, again puts US at front of death penalty debate
We don't know if Taylor Swift will appear in Super Bowl ads, but here are 13 of her best
Bipartisan Tennessee proposal would ask voters to expand judges’ ability to deny bail
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
Horoscopes Today, January 26, 2024
Greta Gerwig deserves more than an Oscar for portrayal of motherhood in 'Barbie'
Parents are charged with manslaughter after a 3-year-old fatally shoots his toddler brother