Current:Home > MarketsJudge skeptical of lawsuit brought by Elon Musk's X over hate speech research -Legacy Profit Partners
Judge skeptical of lawsuit brought by Elon Musk's X over hate speech research
View
Date:2025-04-14 19:30:05
A federal judge in San Francisco appears poised to toss a lawsuit brought by Elon's Musk's X against a nonprofit that found the platform allowed hate speech to spread on the site once known as Twitter.
Last year, lawyers for X sued the Center for Countering Digital Hate, claiming the group improperly scraped X to prepare damning reports about the proliferation of hate speech on the site.
But in a hearing over Zoom on Thursday, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer appeared highly skeptical of the case, devoting the majority of the proceeding to grilling Musk's lawyer over why the lawsuit was brought at all.
Jon Hawk, X's lawyer, said at core the suit is about honoring data security agreements to protect the platform's users.
Breyer was unconvinced.
"You put that in terms of safety, and I've got to tell you, I guess you can use that word, but I can't think of anything basically more antithetical to the First Amendment than this process of silencing people from publicly disseminated information once it's been published," Breyer said.
"You're trying to shoehorn this theory by using these words into a viable breach of contract claim," the judge added.
Judge calls argument from Musk lawyer 'vapid'
X contends that the CCDH violated the platform's terms of service by using a third-party tool called Brandwatch to analyze posts on the site to prepare reports critical of X.
The social media company argued that, in the process, CCDH gained unauthorized access to nonpublic data.
Much of Thursday's hearing turned on what exactly constitutes scraping and whether the center did indeed violate X's terms of service by collecting data for its reports.
X is seeking damages from the center, arguing that the platform lost tens of millions of dollars from advertisers fleeing the site in the wake of the nonprofit's findings.
But in order to make this case, X had to show the group knew the financial loss was "foreseeable" when it started its account and began abiding by Twitter's terms of service, in 2019, before Musk acquired the site.
X lawyer Hawk argued that the platform's terms of service state that the rules for the site could change at any time, including that suspended users whom the group says spread hate speech could be reinstated.
And so, Hawk said, if changes to the rules were foreseeable, then the financial loss from its reports on users spreading hate should have also been foreseeable.
This logic confused and frustrated the judge.
"That, of course, reduces foreseeability to one of the most vapid extensions of law I've ever heard," Breyer said.
CCDH's lawyer: Case is a nonprofit versus the world's richest man
John Quinn, an attorney for CCDH, said the researchers' use of the third-party search tool never accessed non-public posts
"This idea that this is about data security, this is about user data, there was something to investigate, is implausible," Quinn said.
Among CCDH's reports was one highlighting how X took no action against 99 out of 100 users it flagged for posting hate, including racism, homophobia and Neo-Nazism.
Research into the uptick of hate speech on X has in part fueled an exodus among advertisers on the platform that has so kneecapped the company that Musk himself has repeatedly floated the possibility of bankruptcy.
Late late year, major advertisers like Walmart, Apple, Disney and IBM stopped advertising on X after Musk endorsed an antisemitic post that claimed Jewish communities push hatred of white people.
In response, Musk lashed out. He told companies: "Don't advertise" and used the F-word on the stage of a public event to curse out firms that distanced themselves from the platform.
CCDH, through its spokespeople and staff, have tied their legal battle with Musk to last year's boycott.
The group has portrayed X's lawsuit as Musk's attempt to silence criticism, and in Thursday's hearing, the group cited California's so-called anti-SLAPP laws — which protect people and groups from frivolous lawsuits aimed at suppressing free speech.
"Everything in that statute recognizes that very often the litigation itself is the punishment," Quinn told the judge. "We are representing a non-profit organization here being sued by the world's richest man."
Near the end of the hearing, the judge noted that if something is proven to be true a defamation lawsuit falls apart. Why, he said, didn't Musk's X bring a defamation suit if the company believes X's reputation has been harmed?
"You could've brought a defamation case, you didn't bring a defamation case," Breyer said. "And that's significant."
veryGood! (169)
Related
- 'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
- Retired Georgia mascot Uga X dies. 'Que' the bulldog repped two national champion teams.
- Costco, Sam's Club replicas of $1,200 Anthropologie mirror go viral
- Niecy Nash Reveals How She's Related to Oscar Nominees Danielle Brooks and Sterling K. Brown
- Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
- San Diego just saw its rainiest day in January history as officials warn of the fragile state of the city's infrastructure
- Malaria mass-vaccination program launches in Cameroon, bringing hope as Africa battles surging infections
- Dakota Johnson Clarifies Her Viral 14-Hour Sleep Schedule
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Emily Blunt, America Ferrera and More Can Officially Call Themselves First-Time Oscar Nominees
Ranking
- Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
- Italian Jewish leader slams use of Holocaust survivor quote by group planning anti-Israel protest
- France’s president seeks a top-5 medal ranking for his country at the Paris Olympics
- America Ferrera earns Oscar nomination for Barbie after Golden Globes snub
- Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
- Rifts within Israel resurface as war in Gaza drags on. Some want elections now
- Bill would revise Tennessee’s decades-old law targeting HIV-positive people convicted of sex work
- Mississippi governor wants lawmakers to approve incentives for new economic development project
Recommendation
Intellectuals vs. The Internet
911 calls show fears of residents and friends after a young man got shot entering the wrong home
Poland’s president pardons 2 imprisoned politicians from previous conservative government -- again
Netflix’s gains 13M new global 4Q subscribers as it unwraps its best-ever holiday season results
Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
eBay to lay off 1,000 workers as tech job losses continue in the new year
Kansas lawmakers want a report on last year’s police raid of a newspaper
These new synthetic opioids could make fentanyl crisis look like 'the good old days'
Like
- New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
- Most United Methodist Church disaffiliations are in the South: Final report outlines latest in ongoing split.
- Nebraska lawmaker announces Democratic bid for Congress, says Republicans bend to ‘vocal minority’